CO129-294 - Governor Sir Blake - 1899 [10-12] — Page 204

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Section 2 of this Ordinance effects rather an important amendment in Ordinance 25 of 1897 by enacting a new clause for clause C of section 21 of the latter Ordinance. As clause C of that Ordinance originally stood, the shipmaster would be liable for the costs and charges of a sailor other than a Chinese who was discharged from a ship in this Colony if such person became a Vagrant within a period of six months from the date of his arrival in the Colony, altogether irrespective of the fact whether the shipmaster had properly discharged that sailor with the sanction of the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office or his Deputy, and also altogether irrespective of the fact whether the shipmaster had made reasonable provision for the subsistence of that discharged sailor. It was considered by shipowners that that was rather a hardship upon masters of ships, and accordingly the Board of Trade reported the matter to the Secretary of State with the result that the Secretary of State directed that a new clause should be substituted in section 21 of Ordinance 25 of 1897, and that such new clause should be worded in the manner set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance.

By the same section of this Ordinance, the term "seaman" is substituted for the term "sailor". The object of that amendment is to include any person employed or engaged in any capacity on board a ship (except masters, pilots, and apprentices) and not merely persons engaged in the navigation of the ship.

The first amendment made by Section 3 of the Ordinance has been introduced in order to make it clear that the provisions of section 25(1) of Ordinance 28 of 1852 are intended to be applied in the case of a shipwrecked person. The second amendment introduced by this section has been made in consequence of it having been represented to the Secretary of State by the Board of Trade that it was not reasonable to hold a shipmaster responsible for the solvency of a person landed by him during a period of six months after he had landed that person.

26.5.05, Portaal
Acting Attorney General.

Edit History

2026-05-31 09:24:39 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Section 2 of this Ordinance effects rather an important amendment in Ordinance 25 of 1897 by enacting a new clause for clause C of section 21 of the latter Ordinance. As clause C of that Ordinance originally stood, the shipmaster would be liable for the costs and charges of a sailor other than a Chinese who was discharged from a ship in this Colony if such person became a Vagrant within a period of six months from the date of his arrival in the Colony, altogether irrespective of the fact whether the shipmaster had properly discharged that sailor with the sanction of the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office or his Deputy, and also altogether irrespective of the fact whether the shipmaster had made reasonable provision for the subsistence of that discharged sailor. It was considered by shipowners that that was rather a hardship upon masters of ships, and accordingly the Board of Trade reported the matter to the Secretary of State with the result that the Secretary of State directed that a new clause should be substituted in section 21 of Ordinance 25 of 1897, and that such new clause should be worded in the manner set forth in Section 2 of this Ordinance. By the same section of this Ordinance, the term "seaman" is substituted for the term "sailor". The object of that amendment is to include any person employed or engaged in any capacity on board a ship (except masters, pilots, and apprentices) and not merely persons engaged in the navigation of the ship. The first amendment made by Section 3 of the Ordinance has been introduced in order to make it clear that the provisions of section 25(1) of Ordinance 28 of 1852 are intended to be applied in the case of a shipwrecked person. The second amendment introduced by this section has been made in consequence of it having been represented to the Secretary of State by the Board of Trade that it was not reasonable to hold a shipmaster responsible for the solvency of a person landed by him during a period of six months after he had landed that person. 26.5.05, Portaal Acting Attorney General.
Baseline (Original)
Section 2 of this Ordinance effects rathis an important amendment in Ordinance 25 of 1897 by enfortituting Any ADA month r new clause for clause C of vection. 21 of the latter Bedinance. As clanse Cof that Ordinence originally stood the slipmacht would be liable for the costs and charges Vagrant of Dailer other than a Chinese who was discharged from a ship in this Colony if auch person bica nu Vagrant within a period of oix. from the date of his arrival in the Colony, altogether irrespective of the fact whether the ship master had properly discharged that sailor with the suction of the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office of his Deputy, and also altogether irrespective of the fact whether the shipmaster had made reasonable provision for the onboistence of that biocharged sailor. It was considered by shipownets that that is rather o hardship upon of ships and accordingly the Board of Trade roached the secretary of State in thie that with the result that the Secretary of State directed that a new Zua the mock 20 clause (should be substituted in section 21 of Ordinance 25 of 1897 and that such new clause otionle be worded in the manner set froth inn Section 2 of this Bdinance. By the same section of this Ordinance the tean" seaman is substituted for the term "" sailor". he > } 201 The object of that armendment is to include اهنگ arry perean employed of capacity engaged in any a on board ship (except macters piloto and apprentices ) and not merely pereans engaged in the navigation of the ship. The first Amendment mode by action 3 of the Ordinanc: hav been in fod ved air ordu to make it clear that the provisions of section 251) intended to be applied of Ordinance 28 of 1852 As the case of a shiperrecked perean. Re she dicondannendenz by sections has been introduced mi consequen of it having been -reportented to the secretary of State by the Board of Trade that it was not reasonable to hold a ship machi responsible for the solvency of a par landed by shin during a period of vise months after he had landed The and person. مجھے 26.5. Portaal Acting Attorney General.
2026-05-31 09:24:39 · Baseline
View content

Section 2 of this Ordinance effects rathis an important amendment in Ordinance 25 of 1897 by enfortituting

Any

ADA

month

r

new clause for clause C of vection. 21 of the latter Bedinance. As clanse Cof that Ordinence originally stood the slipmacht would be liable for the costs and charges

Vagrant of Dailer other than a Chinese who was discharged from a ship

in this Colony if auch person bica nu Vagrant within a period of oix. from the date of his arrival in the Colony, altogether irrespective of the fact whether the ship master had properly discharged that sailor with the suction of the Superintendent of the Mercantile Marine Office of his Deputy, and also altogether irrespective of the fact whether the shipmaster had made reasonable provision for the onboistence of that biocharged sailor. It was considered by shipownets that that is rather o hardship upon

of ships and accordingly the Board of Trade roached the secretary of State in thie that with the result that the Secretary of State directed that a new

Zua

the mock 20

clause (should be substituted in section 21 of Ordinance 25 of 1897 and that such new clause otionle be worded in the manner set froth inn Section 2 of this Bdinance.

By the same section of this

Ordinance the tean" seaman is substituted for the term "" sailor".

he

>

}

201

The object of that armendment is to

include

اهنگ arry

perean employed of

capacity

engaged in any

a

on board

ship (except macters piloto and apprentices ) and not merely pereans engaged in the navigation of the ship.

The first

Amendment mode

by action 3 of the Ordinanc: hav

been in fod ved air ordu to

make it

clear that the provisions of section 251) intended to be applied

of Ordinance 28 of 1852

As the case

of a shiperrecked perean. Re

she dicondannendenz

by sections has been introduced mi consequen

of it having been -reportented to the secretary of State by the Board of Trade that it was not reasonable to hold a ship machi responsible for the solvency of a par landed by shin during a period of vise months after he had landed

The and person.

مجھے

26.5. Portaal

Acting Attorney General.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.